Anyone who grew up in the 1990’s knows the meaning behind the question “Where’s Waldo?” The answer, though, might surprise you. That’s because you won’t find him in some public or school libraries in the United States.
Where’s Wally? (published in the United States and Canada as Where’s Waldo?) is a series of children’s books created by British illustrator Martin Handford. The books are made up of detailed illustrations of themed scenes in which the reader is challenged to find the title character hidden somewhere in the mix. His characteristic red-and-white striped shirt, puff-ball hat, and glasses make him easier to recognize, but many illustrations contain “red herrings” to trick and further challenge the reader.
So why would a harmless series of funny illustrations be on the ALA’s Top 100 Banned Books list for much of the 1990’s?
A handful of people say that the otherwise-innocent images contain “inappropriate and seditious hidden imagery” including topless sunbathers, gay lovers, characters holding up the rocker hand sign (or, as they call it- the “hail Satan”), and a medley of other hysterical claims.
Anyone who’s seen the books knows it’s almost impossible to find Waldo himself, let alone anything of controversy. But that’s exactly what someone claimed in regards to the debut 1987 edition of the series. The infamous charge was in reference to a page containing a frenzied beach scene in which a woman tanning without her bikini top is being splashed on the back with water and the dots in the sand creating the impression that her nipple is erect. The scene is made all-the-more controversial due to the image of two men in a somewhat compromising position to the upper left of the topless sunbather. One of the men happens to be black, prompting those who take offense to the apparently homosexual situation to also call foul with issues of interracial coupling.
An enlarged version of the original 1987 image can be seen below. By the way, the offending breast in the book only measures 1/16”. Some people have way too much free time on their hands.
You can click the link here for the full two-page image. Please note that this is from a censored 1997 “special 10th anniversary edition.” It took me a few minutes just to find the controversial section, let alone the fact that, as of publication of this article, I have yet to find Waldo himself in the scene.
One has to wonder how many people would have noticed the perceived nip-slip if nothing was ever said. Regardless, as a result the book was removed from several schools and libraries including the Saginaw, Michigan public schools in 1989 and the Springs Public School Library in East Hampton, New York in 1993.
A similar image appears in the “Campsite” scene, where children open a tent on a man while he is changing. Although his genitals are blocked from view by his hand, he is clearly naked; in the 1997 special edition, however, he is wearing white underwear.
So censorship efforts are no longer just a matter of picking words and phrases out of context from these books; some people are, quite literally, taking a magnifying glass and trying to find anything of offense to complain about. The limitless bounds of politically-correct cultural absurdity have finally extended to the furthest realms of the book world. Hey, book burners, I have news for you- Porky Pig and Winnie-the-Pooh never wear pants. Are they on your hit list as well?
Sources: American Library Association, Snopes.com,babble.com, anovelreview.com, New York Times, University of Missouri
© 2011 R. Wolf Baldassarro/Deep Forest Productions
I found Waldo almost immediately – he's towards the upper center creating triangle with the sail boat and the other boat to the right of it.
Sailboat Otherboat
W
No he's not. Waldo is bottom centre, to the right of the bouncing ball, surrounded by a few babes (I clearly have too much time on my hands!)
Both of you must be high…
Waldo is not by the boats (the second boat is a tugboat)
He is in slightly above the center of the picture. To the left of the puppet theater, above the woman holding up the blanket with a hole in it,to the right of the balding man with his wife and screaming kid,and right below the red bag.
Yep, Joey’s right 😉
Thats exactly where Stephen Catts said he was, forming a triangle with the two boats.
well, on the full page view the woman has on a top,, so why is this close up showing her without a top?
The article states “beach scene in which a woman tanning without her bikini top is being splashed on the back”, but I see a boy unsnapping the woman’s top, that is indicated by a pop action drawing showing the action. So, the woman was not sun bathing topless intentionally. How can someone not see that? And the two guys obliviously just tripped and fell on each other. Some people are so uptight, it must be hard to live like that.
Jenna: It states right in my article “You can click the link here for the full two-page image. Please note that this is from a censored 1997 “special 10th anniversary edition.””
I could not find the full two-page spread of the original uncensored version at press time.
LOL its hilarious that people thought those two men were doing something “gay” when its obvious that theyre supposed to have tripped over each other due to seeing that woman’s naked breasts.
I mean how much of a closet case do you have to be to see two guys ogling a pair of breasts, not understand why they would do that, and think to yourself, “hmmm, i wonder what homoerotic shenanigans these two strapping, shirtless lads are up to!”. You know sometimes it makes you think the only reason these religious ninnies become Christians in the first place is because they get such a boner over seeing a sweaty, half-naked Jesus tied up to a piece of Roman iconography.
do you thi8nk banned books will appear on the xbox one
The limitless bounds of politically-correct cultural absurdity have finally extended to the furthest realms of the book world. Casquette OBEY
I don’t think this book should be banned……………. 🙂
Great book makes me sad its banned
BTW…..the topless woman actually is drawn with a bikini bra top on her.
Nice try.